Why fund controllers choose Ceviche over IntegriDATA EAS
One product, with no developer queue.
By its public materials, EAS rules are written as code and reports are built as queries, and it ships its own AP and payments layer. In Ceviche, your controller owns the rules on the AP stack you already run, with core go-live in 2 to 4 weeks.
SOC 2 Type 2 compliantTop 3 reasons to pick Ceviche over IntegriDATA EAS
Core go-live in 2 to 4 weeks
By its public materials, EAS onboarding starts with 6 to 8 weeks for reference data alone, with integrations scoped as development. Core go-live with Ceviche takes 2 to 4 weeks, with onboarding included in the subscription.
Run by accountants instead of developers
By its public materials, custom reports and queries in EAS require code, and integration work is scoped as development. In Ceviche, your accounting team owns the rules. Queries and reports are self-serve. Your team makes simple rule changes itself, and complex ones come back from our team within 48 hours.
Your LPA enforced at allocation time
Ceviche turns each fund agreement into caps, exclusions, and entity eligibility that apply as costs allocate. An expense outside the LPA goes to review before it reaches a fund's ledger.
Compare Ceviche vs IntegriDATA EAS
Competitor columns summarize each vendor's public materials and what we hear from teams we speak with, as of September 2026.
 Ceviche | IntegriDATA EAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Your AP stack | Stays. Ceviche allocates above Ramp, Brex, Bill.com | Its own AP and payments modules, per its public materials |
| Who runs it | Your accounting team, self-serve | Custom reports and queries require code, per its public materials |
| Rule changes | Simple changes self-serve, complex ones within 48 hours | Integrations scoped as development work, per its public materials |
| LPA policies | Enforced at allocation time | Rules configured as code, per its public materials |
| Audit trail | Per line, invoice to entry, with methodology snapshots | Advertises a complete audit trail, per its public materials |
| Implementation period | 2 to 4 weeks to core go-live, onboarding included. New GL connections and historical data are scoped separately | 6 to 8 weeks for reference data alone, per its public materials |
Compare using AIOpens ChatGPT in a new tab.Your AP stack stays
By its public materials, EAS is built as a suite: its own AP, its own payments, its own workflows. Ceviche assumes you already picked Ramp, Brex, or Bill.com and like them. It reads from your stack, allocates under your LPA, and posts to your GL.
For example, a quarter's legal and audit invoices come in through Bill.com. Ceviche splits each line across your funds under the LPA and posts the entries to your GL. Your team pays the invoices from Bill.com as before.
Ramp
Brex
Bill.com
How Flybridge moved quarterly allocations out of Excel across 18+ fund entities
“Ceviche streamlines our close process, organizes our data for audits, and drafts entries for our fund admin, all in a single workflow.”
Quarterly allocations ran in spreadsheets on top of QuickBooks Online and Bill.com. They now run through Ceviche and post to QuickBooks Online. Every allocation traces back to its source documents, with a full audit trail.
Why Ceviche stands out
EAS is an established system in this category. Ceviche is one product, run by the team that owns the close, with core go-live in 2 to 4 weeks.
Your AP stack and your GL both stay. Ceviche reads every invoice, applies your LPA line by line, and posts entries with the full audit trail attached.
Frequently asked questions
No. Controllers configure rules, run allocations, and pull reports themselves. There is no ticket queue.
Yes. You can run one or two allocation cycles in both systems, compare the outputs line by line, and then move to Ceviche. Core go-live takes 2 to 4 weeks.
It stays. Ceviche allocates above Ramp, Brex, or Bill.com and posts entries to your GL.
EAS is the Expense Allocation System built by IntegriDATA, an Indus Valley Partners company. Its product page describes automated allocation rules across funds, deals, and segments. It describes allocation by AUM, NAV, market value, holdings, or custom logic, and N-level fund hierarchies. It places these features inside a broader suite that covers invoice OCR, vendor management, payments, fund billing, and BI reporting.
Get your close back.
Bring your hardest invoice to thirty minutes with our CEO. We will split an invoice like it and show you the approval and the math behind it.