Why customers choose Ceviche over IntegriDATA EAS
One product. No developer queue.
EAS makes allocation a developer's job: rules are code, reports are queries, and it comes with its own AP and payments layer. Ceviche makes it your controller's job: self-serve rules, the AP stack you already run, live in 3 to 4 weeks.
SOC 2 Type 2 compliantTop 3 reasons controllers pick Ceviche over IntegriDATA EAS
Run by accountants, not developers
In EAS, custom reports and queries require code, and integration work is scoped as development. In Ceviche your accounting team owns the rules. Queries, reports, and changes are self-serve.
Live in weeks, not waves
EAS onboarding starts with 6 to 8 weeks for reference data alone, with integrations scoped as development. Ceviche runs 3 to 4 weeks from signed contract to first close run, with no separate implementation bill.
Your LPA, enforced at allocation time
Ceviche turns each fund agreement into caps, thresholds, exclusions, and entity eligibility that apply as costs allocate. An expense a fund should not bear never reaches its ledger.
Compare Ceviche vs IntegriDATA EAS
The differences that decide your close, side by side.
 Ceviche | IntegriDATA EAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Your AP stack | Stays. Ceviche allocates above Ramp, Brex, Bill.com | Comes with its own AP and payments layer |
| Who runs it | Your accounting team, self-serve | Developer-led. Reports and queries require code |
| Rule changes | Self-serve, same-day to 48 hours | Development cycles |
| LPA policies | Enforced at allocation time | Depends on developer-built rules |
| Audit trail | Per line, invoice to entry, with methodology snapshots | Audit reporting assembled via custom queries |
| Time to live | 3–4 weeks, no separate implementation bill | Multi-month, scoped per engagement |
Compare using AIOpens ChatGPT in a new tab.Your AP stack stays put
EAS was built as a suite: its own AP, its own payments, its own workflows. Ceviche assumes you already picked Ramp, Brex, or Bill.com and like them. We read from your stack, allocate under your LPA, and post to your GL.
How Flybridge unified quarterly allocations across 18+ fund entities
“Ceviche streamlines our close process, organizes our data for audits, and drafts entries for our fund admin, all in a single workflow.”
Every allocation traces back to source documentation with a full audit trail, turning year-end fire drills into one-click PDF pulls.
Why does Ceviche stand out?
EAS more or less created this category, and it runs at some of the largest managers in the industry. Ceviche is what the next version looks like: one product, run by the team that owns the close, live in weeks instead of waves.
Your AP stack stays. Your GL stays. Ceviche reads every invoice, applies your LPA line by line, and posts entries with the full trail attached.
Ceviche vs IntegriDATA EAS, answered
No. Controllers configure rules, run allocations, and pull reports themselves. There is no ticket queue.
Yes. Teams typically run one or two allocation cycles in parallel, compare outputs line by line, then cut over. Go-live is 3–4 weeks.
It stays. Ceviche allocates above Ramp, Brex, or Bill.com and posts entries to your GL.
EAS is the Expense Allocation System built by IntegriDATA, an Indus Valley Partners company. Its product page describes automated allocation rules across funds, deals, and segments, allocation by AUM, NAV, market value, holdings, or custom logic, and N-level fund hierarchies, inside a broader suite covering invoice OCR, vendor management, payments, fund billing, and BI reporting.
Stop reconciling. Get it right the first time.
Move your fund expense allocation process on Ceviche today.